GOVERNMENT AND NHS FAIL TO ACT DESPITE REPEATED WARNINGS OVER PATIENT SAFETY
In a new report, the PAC finds that, as government’s liability for clinical negligence quadrupled over 20 years (£60bn in ’24-’25), the DHSC is unable to show any meaningful action taken to address this, and that the NHS has not done enough to tackle the underlying causes of patient harm.
The report paints a picture of a system overwhelmed by safety recommendations that it cannot action, with evidence that, despite the NHS in England keeping a plethora of data on patient harm, its fragmented nature does not amount to good information which could identify and address clinical negligence’s underlying causes.
The PAC is further highlighting the problem of disproportionate legal costs in clinical negligence claims. Claimant legal fees more than tripled to £538m in 2024-25, while claims with damages of £25k or less cost far more in fees than victims receive, with a cost-to-damages ratio of 3.7 to 1.
Government’s previous plans to limit the amount paid to lawyers in lower-value cases were not implemented as planned two years ago, and the DHSC should develop an alternative mechanism to speed up decisions and reduce costs for these cases.
Recent increases in settlement costs (tripling to £3.6bn in ’24-’25) are likely to rise significantly to over £4bn/yr by the end of the decade, with these costs representing many tragic incidences of patient harm.
However, despite warnings from the PAC dating back to 2002, the DHSC would not commit to acting to make improvements to the fundamental issues of clinical negligence until the completion of a review announced last year, for which it did not have an expected date. The PAC is seeking, within two months of this report:
-
an operational plan from government to tackle clinical negligence;
-
a national framework for improving patient safety with clear annual improvement targets, and
-
a national system for sharing data between NHS trusts.
-
The report calls in particular for the DHSC to learn lessons from its failure to improve maternity care in England, and set out how it plans to reduce the incidence of harm and the costs of claims in this area.
The report shows settled claims involving infants and children increasing significantly, reaching £325m in claims for paediatric failings in 2024-25. The inquiry heard that 120-130 brain injury cases involving children are settled every year, but it can take an average of 11-12 years to resolve each claim, at a high cost both for the victim’s experience and financially.
Evidence to the PAC’s inquiry from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists suggested that the maternity workforce is struggling under the pressure of delivering increasingly complex care, with more than half of births involving medical intervention, such as a caesarean section or the use of instruments such as forceps.
Further evidence raised concerns that inadequate training, poor workforce planning and failure to adhere to staffing requirements have created the conditions for clinical negligence claims to occur.
The PAC asks that DHSC and NHS find and fix systemic failings in care, and for the publication of the Amos review into maternity and neonatal care in England within two months alongside its response to the report.
Finally, the report notes that claims being settled on the basis of how much a victim’s care would cost in the private sector, rather than in the NHS, stem from a law from 1948.
The inquiry heard that this is a major contributory factor to the increasing cost of very high-value cases of £1m+. It is not clear how far the taxpayer is paying twice for clinical negligence – once when a victim is compensated, and then again if the victim uses the NHS for their subsequent care rather than the private sector.
STATEMENT FROM DO NO HARM ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE REPORT INTO CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE.
EMBARGOED: 00.01 FRIDAY 30/1/26
‘Do No Harm’ welcomes the latest report by the Common’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) into clinical negligence and the growing costs.
We believe the key to reducing costs within the NHS is to reduce the number of surgical and medical injuries and by immediately ending the internal culture which produces ‘roadblocks’ stopping victims from finding the truth about why they were harmed.
This has been the plea from so many injured patients for so long and has been heard repeatedly by parents who have suffered the death of a child in one of the country’s maternity units. Some have said that they feel they are treated as badly as the victims of the Post Office Sub-Postmasters scandal and in both cases, lives have been destroyed.
The drive to reduce legal costs within cases which settle below £25,000 would block access to justice for so many innocent people and overlooks the fact that these so-called ‘low value’ cases may be fatalities and are as legally complicated to resolve as larger settlements.
We also believe that many victims and their families do want answers and not money, but when you are dealing with catastrophic outcomes compensation is appropriate.
We welcome Wes Streeting MP’s appointment of David Lock KC to review this area of law and to find new ways of dealing with the issue of patient safety. However, that should not come at the expense of families torn apart by grief but through speedier answers, complete candour, and an emphasis on the first principle of medicine to ‘Do No Harm’.
Ends.
Established in 2025 the campaign group seeks justice for victims of clinical negligence in England and Wales and fights for their right to receive full legal representation and justice.
It brings together clinicians, lawyers fighting for justice and victims and their families.
It opposes any legal changes which will limit access to justice as proposed by previous governments.